Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies

P. Sol Hart, Erik C. Nisbet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 191 Citations

Abstract

The deficit-model of science communication assumes increased communication about science issues will move public opinion toward the scientific consensus. However, in the case of climate change, public polarization about the issue has increased in recent years, not diminished. In this study, we draw from theories of motivated reasoning, social identity, and persuasion to examine how science-based messages may increase public polarization on controversial science issues such as climate change. Exposing 240 adults to simulated news stories about possible climate change health impacts on different groups, we found the influence of identification with potential victims was contingent on participants' political partisanship. This partisanship increased the degree of political polarization on support for climate mitigation policies and resulted in a boomerang effect among Republican participants. Implications for understanding the role of motivated reasoning within the context of science communication are discussed.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages701-723
Number of pages23
JournalCommunication Research
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

communication sciences
climate policy
Climate change
polarization
Science of Communication
climate change
Polarization
Communication
persuasion
science
public opinion
deficit
news
Health
health
Climate
Science Communication
Climate Change
Mitigation
Group

Keywords

  • boomerang effects
  • climate change
  • science communication
  • social identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{41f88c8e9a3a49b3aa7845cfff0f7670,
title = "Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies",
abstract = "The deficit-model of science communication assumes increased communication about science issues will move public opinion toward the scientific consensus. However, in the case of climate change, public polarization about the issue has increased in recent years, not diminished. In this study, we draw from theories of motivated reasoning, social identity, and persuasion to examine how science-based messages may increase public polarization on controversial science issues such as climate change. Exposing 240 adults to simulated news stories about possible climate change health impacts on different groups, we found the influence of identification with potential victims was contingent on participants' political partisanship. This partisanship increased the degree of political polarization on support for climate mitigation policies and resulted in a boomerang effect among Republican participants. Implications for understanding the role of motivated reasoning within the context of science communication are discussed.",
keywords = "boomerang effects, climate change, science communication, social identity",
author = "Hart, {P. Sol} and Nisbet, {Erik C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093650211416646",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "701--723",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boomerang Effects in Science Communication

T2 - Communication Research

AU - Hart,P. Sol

AU - Nisbet,Erik C.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - The deficit-model of science communication assumes increased communication about science issues will move public opinion toward the scientific consensus. However, in the case of climate change, public polarization about the issue has increased in recent years, not diminished. In this study, we draw from theories of motivated reasoning, social identity, and persuasion to examine how science-based messages may increase public polarization on controversial science issues such as climate change. Exposing 240 adults to simulated news stories about possible climate change health impacts on different groups, we found the influence of identification with potential victims was contingent on participants' political partisanship. This partisanship increased the degree of political polarization on support for climate mitigation policies and resulted in a boomerang effect among Republican participants. Implications for understanding the role of motivated reasoning within the context of science communication are discussed.

AB - The deficit-model of science communication assumes increased communication about science issues will move public opinion toward the scientific consensus. However, in the case of climate change, public polarization about the issue has increased in recent years, not diminished. In this study, we draw from theories of motivated reasoning, social identity, and persuasion to examine how science-based messages may increase public polarization on controversial science issues such as climate change. Exposing 240 adults to simulated news stories about possible climate change health impacts on different groups, we found the influence of identification with potential victims was contingent on participants' political partisanship. This partisanship increased the degree of political polarization on support for climate mitigation policies and resulted in a boomerang effect among Republican participants. Implications for understanding the role of motivated reasoning within the context of science communication are discussed.

KW - boomerang effects

KW - climate change

KW - science communication

KW - social identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868114295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868114295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093650211416646

DO - 10.1177/0093650211416646

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 701

EP - 723

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 6

ER -